| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Hannah Ginsborg ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Hannah Ginsborg
Hannah Ginsborg is Professor of Philosophy at the University of California, Berkeley. She received a B.A. in Philosophy and Modern Languages (French) from the University of Oxford in 1980 and a Ph.D. in Philosophy from Harvard University in 1989. Her education included a year in Paris (1978-1979) studying logic and philosophy at the Université de Paris-I, and a year in Berlin (1985-1986) affiliated with the Freie Universität. Since 1988 she has been teaching at the University of California, Berkeley. In 2004-2005 she was a visiting scholar at the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science in Berlin. She spent the academic year 2010-2011 as a Fellow at the Wissenschaftskolleg in Berlin and the fall of 2014 as a Visiting Research Professor at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich.
==Research==
Much of Ginsborg’s research, beginning with her 1989 doctoral thesis “The Role of Taste in Kant’s Theory of Cognition,” has been concerned with Immanuel Kant’s ''Critique of Judgment''. She has argued for the importance of the ''Critique of Judgment'' to Kant’s theory of cognition 〔 Wenzel, C. H. (2009), Kant's Aesthetics: Overview and Recent Literature. Philosophy Compass, 4: 380–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00214.x 〕〔 Kukla, R. 2006. “Placing the Aesthetic in Kant’s Critical Epistemology,” in Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant's Critical Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 3 〕 and for the internal unity of the Critique of Judgment, which she sees as grounded in a notion of purposiveness as normativity. 〔Stratton-Lake, P. (1998) Review of Reclaiming the History of Ethics, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 6:3, 445-473, DOI: 10.1080/096725598342064Review of Reclaiming the History of Ethics〕〔 Zuckert, R (2007). Kant on Beauty and Biology. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 84n.28〕 〔Interview with Hannah Ginsborg, ''The Reasoner'', Vol. 9 No. 5, July 2015, ISSN (Online) 1757-0522.〕 Within Kant’s aesthetics, she has proposed a controversial interpretation of judgments of beauty as self-referential judgments which claim their own universal validity. 〔 Linda Palmer (2008). A Universality Not Based on Concepts: Kant's Key to the Critique of Taste. Kantian Review, 13, pp 1-51. doi:10.1017/S1369415400001084.〕 This “austere”〔 account rests on a distinctive notion of normativity – a normativity not based on rules or concepts -- which also figures in her interpretation of Kant’s theory of biology.〔 Teufel, Thomas (2011). Kant's Non-Teleological Conception of Purposiveness. Kant-Studien. Volume 102, Issue 2, Pages 232–252, ISSN (Online) 1613-1134, ISSN (Print) 0022-8877, DOI: 10.1515/kant.2011.017〕
Since 2006 she has applied this notion of normativity to issues in the interpretation of Kant’s ''Critique of Pure Reason'', in particular questions about Kant’s theory of perceptual experience and the question of whether Kant was a nonconceptualist, and to issues in contemporary philosophy including the philosophy of perception, the theory of knowledge, and the philosophy of language and mind.〔 see Ginsborg’s CV〕 She has argued that this notion of normativity, which she calls “primitive normativity,” resolves the paradox about rule-following which Saul Kripke finds in Wittgenstein 〔 Adrian Haddock, “Meaning, Justification, And ‘Primitive Normativity’”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume lxxxvi doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8349.2012.00212.x 〕 and helps makes sense of the controversial idea that meaning is normative.〔 Whiting, Daniel (2013): What is the Normativity of Meaning?, Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, DOI:10.1080/0020174X.2013.852132 (p. 8 n. 23)〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Hannah Ginsborg」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|